Drawing for POWER WHEEL DETAILER

USPTO serial 87300876

POWER WHEEL DETAILER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER WHEEL DETAILER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph S. Heino

JOSEPH S HEINO DAVIS & KUELTHAU SC111 E KILBOURN AVENUESUITE 1400MILWAUKEE, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Vehicle washing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 10, 2018RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Nov 19, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 4, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 18, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 18, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 18, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 20, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 20, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance