Drawing for TULIP RETAIL

USPTO serial 87301219

TULIP RETAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5784495Status 705
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 25, 2019
Examiner
THOMAS-RIGGS, LESLIE A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.

Status 705: Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights.

Need help with TULIP RETAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Ims

Peter J. Ims Westman, Champlin & Koehler, P.A.121 S 8th St Suite1100Minneapolis, MN 55402United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for providing product knowledge, namely, information about products for sale, and for providing checkout transactions and cash drawer management, clientele relationship management, and store operations management, all in the field of retail salesACTIVE—
042[ Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software and software platforms for providing product knowledge, namely, information about products for sale, and for providing checkout transactions and cash drawer management, clientele relationship management, and store operations management, all in the field of retail sales ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2026CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD—
Sep 11, 2026ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 9, 2026REINREINSTATED—
Sep 4, 2026C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 25, 2026NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2026C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 23, 2026EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2026PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Mar 4, 2026REINREINSTATED—
Mar 3, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 9, 2026C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 29, 2025E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 9, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2019FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Mar 1, 2019ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 23, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance