USPTO serial 87301575
UNITY CHORUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNITY CHORUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven A. Abreu
STEVEN A ABREU SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP125 SUMMER STREETSUITE 1100BOSTON, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software, namely, an enterprise-class data storage system comprised of computer hardware with the ability to store data in block and file formats and provide enterprise file sync and share with mobile access and secure archive, for use by information technology departments in connection with management, storage, sharing and archiving of corporate data, none of the foregoing including communications transceivers or transceiver software or firmware, computer hardware, or software to allow users to access, store, and share information between public safety entities | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |