Drawing for HUSH LUXURY

USPTO serial 87301913

HUSH LUXURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHAH, RUPALI
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HUSH LUXURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body cream; Exfoliant creams; Face and body beauty creams; Gift baskets containing non-medicated bath preparations and cosmetic preparations; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Lip cream; Non-medicated bath salts; Non-medicated skin creams with essential oils for use in aromatherapyABANDONEDMar 1, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 11, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 11, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 1, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 1, 2018OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 13, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
May 31, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance