Drawing for IRIS OHYAMA

USPTO serial 87302301

IRIS OHYAMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IRIS OHYAMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Beverage cooling apparatus; Coffee machines, electric; Coffee roasters; Dehumidifiers; Electric egg cookers; Electric hand drying apparatus for washrooms; Electric lights for Christmas trees; Fitted liners for baths and showers; Hair drying machines for beauty salon use; Humidifiers; Humidifiers for household purposes; Ice machines; Laundry dryers, electric; LED flashlights; LED underwater lights; Lighting apparatus for vehicles; Searchlights; Sun lamps; USB-powered humidifiers for household use; Water heaters; Air humidifying apparatus; Bicycle lamps; Candle lamps; LED lamps; LED light bulbs; Pocket searchlightsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 26, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 26, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 26, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 17, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 25, 2018RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
May 25, 2018RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
May 25, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
May 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 21, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 20, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 5, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance