USPTO serial 87303637
SAFEFEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFEFEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret Burke
MARGARET BURKE IDEA INTELLECTUAL LIMITED23 Queen's Road West, Sheung Wan21st Floor, Skyway CentreHONG KONG,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photocopiers; Photocopy machines; Photocopying apparatus; Electrostatic copying machines; Thermal copiers; Computer-controlled sheet-feeding apparatus; Unfilled toner cartridges for photocopiers; Unfilled ink cartridges for photocopy machines or computer printers; Cleaning cartridges for photocopy machines and computer printers; Drum units for printers, facsimile machines, scanners, copying machines and multifunction electronic devices for use in copying, printing, scanning, video capture and/or transmitting documents and images; Document printers for use with computers; Document printers; Computer printers for printing documents; Electronic data processing apparatus; Mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways for collection and management of data; Mobile data receivers; Microcontrollers for internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; Computer software for accessing information directories that may be downloaded from the global computer network; Optical character readers; Optical character recognition (OCR) apparatus; Currency sorting machines; Money counting and sorting machines; Automated paper money sorting machines; Automatic teller machines (ATM); Optical receivers; Apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of images; Scanners; Optical scanners; Multifunction electronic devices for use in copying, printing, scanning, video capturing and/or transmitting documents and images; Apparatus for recording and reproduction of sound, images or data; Blank magnetic data carriers; Blank record disks; Blank recordable optical disc; Optical readers; Optical receivers; Optical sensors; Optical inspection apparatus; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical transceivers; Optical inspection apparatus for industrial use; Sorter for photocopying machine; Paper tray for photocopying machine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |