Drawing for SURE SORT

USPTO serial 87303871

SURE SORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NIEMANN, SHELBY LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SURE SORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian K Dinicola

BRIAN K DINICOLA OPEX CORPORATION305 COMMERCE DRMOORESTOWN, NJ 08057UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Automated material handling machines, namely, automated sorting machines employing self-propelled carriers that place items into vertical arrays of storage locations, and electronic controller therefor sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 12, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 12, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance