USPTO serial 87304230
COOK&TABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRER PEREZ, PAUL ANTHONY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOK&TABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gyeongsangnam-Do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jun-Hwa Jeong
JUN-HWA JEONG RABIN & BERDO, P.C.1101 14TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Pot lids; Non-electric heating pots; Non-electric fire pan; Non-electric pots; Non-electric rice cooking pots; Non-electric sauce pans; Non-electric food steamers; Non-electric autoclaves; Non-electric cooking pans; Non-electric cooking pots; Non-electric cooking pots and cauldrons; Non-electric cooking pots and pans; Non-electric woks; Non-electric casserole pans; Non-electric cooking steamers; Non-electric canners; Non-electric cauldrons; Non-electric frying pans; Hot pots not electrically heated; Saucepans; Non-electric cooking pots; Non-electric cooking pot sets; Woks; Non-electric deep fryer; Pans; Frying pans; Fruit bowls; Dessert plates; Mixing bowls; Bowls not of precious metal; Salad bowls not of precious metal; Sauceboats not of precious metals; Services not of precious metal; Table plates not of precious metal; Serving platters not of precious metal; Dishes not of precious metal; Basins; Salad bowls; Gravy boats; Soup bowls; Services namely, dishes; Table plates; Servingware for serving food; Shallow bowls; Serving bowls; Serving dishes; Dishes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |