Drawing for SIX-MILE CREEK

USPTO serial 87304539

SIX-MILE CREEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIX-MILE CREEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brooke J. Egan

BROOKE J. EGAN DUNCAN GALLOWAY EGAN GREENWALD, PLLC9625 ORMSBY STATION ROADLOUISVILLE, KY 40223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, alcoholic beverage and food tastings; providing recreational facilities in the nature of a distillery building and exhibition grounds; Museum services; museum services, namely, exhibiting to the public a historical site; conducting entertainment exhibitions and displays in the nature of distilled spirits and related information; organizing and arranging exhibitions and events for entertainment purposes; conducting guided tours of historical sites and distillery buildingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 20, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2019PGSUPETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED—
Apr 8, 2019ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 27, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 21, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2019PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 19, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 1, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 30, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 12, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 9, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 6, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance