USPTO serial 87304640
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CREUZIER LE NEUF, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle P. Ciotola
MICHELLE P CIOTOLA CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREETFLOOR 22HARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture; cupboards, shelves, storage racks; index cabinets; tables; table tops; work surfaces; the aforementioned products being able to be manufactured using thermoplastic manufacturing processes or produced from thermoplastic material; all of the foregoing not commercial furniture | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |