USPTO serial 87305145
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hara K. Jacobs
HARA K JACOBS BALLARD SPAHR LLP1735 MARKET ST51ST FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Flashlights; lighting products, namely, portable flashlights that are rechargeable via USB; flashing strobe light apparatus; lamps for outdoor use; lanterns for lighting; LED lighting fixtures; outdoor portable lighting products, namely, headlamps; pocket search lights; portable battery-operated lights that can be placed on surfaces where other light sources are unavailable; searchlights; spot lights; non-electric pocket warmers, namely, chemically-activated heating packets for warming hands; chemically activated light sticks; folding gas stoves; portable showers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |