USPTO serial 87305147
AMERICAN OUTDOOR BRANDS CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICAN OUTDOOR BRANDS CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hara K. Jacobs
HARA K JACOBS BALLARD SPAHR LLP1735 MARKET ST51ST FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Firearms and component parts thereof; BB guns; pellet guns; starter pistols; airsoft guns for training purposes; airsoft guns not for recreational use; firearm slings; firearm tactical cases; cases for firearms; range bags especially adapted to carry firearms and munitions to gun ranges; ammunition for firearms; ammunition for muzzle-loading firearms; holders, and pouches for ammunition and shooting accessories; holsters; sprays for personal defense purposes; cleaning implements for firearms, namely, brushes, rods, pull-throughs, closer cups, shell extractors, decappers, bores, chamber mops, gun vises, slotted tips, and dummy ammunition, namely, snap caps and cleaning patches; protective metal coating, sold as a component part of firearms; monopods for firearms; bipods for firearms; tripods for firearms; firearm attachments, namely, mounts for use with monopods, bipods and tripods; accessories for non-telescopic firearm sights, namely, mounts and rests; ammunition loading and reloading equipment, namely, cartridge gages, tumblers, vibratory devices that clean cartridges after firing, gun powder measures and priming pins; component parts for gun reloading tumblers, namely, tumbler nuts and tumbler bowls; case cleaning media, namely, gun cleaning cloth; media separators; sifters in the nature of mesh strainers specially adapted for sorting and separating ammunition components from foreign matter; portable reloading stands for firearms; powder funnels for firearms; bullet pullers; primer tube fillers; ammunition boxes; reloading trays for firearms; firearm gunstock supplies, namely, firearm gunstock bedding kits comprising epoxy resin, hardener, dye, mixing cups, applicators, modeling clay and surgical tubing; firearm gunstock recoil pad installation kits comprising work fixtures, namely, a base for mounting securely to a table or other larger fixed surface and mounting bars; firearm gunstock inletting black for use in detecting imperfections of fit between gunstocks and firearm barrel; firearm gunstock- making hardware comprising butt plates, forend tips and grip caps; bore lapping kits comprising abrasive pastes and steel plates, for use exclusively with firearms and firearm scope ring alignment; bolt face lap tools used for squaring the bolt face of bolt-action rifles; receiver face truing tools used for squaring the face of a rifle receiver to the barrel shoulder; receiver taps used to install new firearm barrels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |