USPTO serial 87306875
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fredericton, NB, CA
Fredericton, NB, CA
Fredericton, NB, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary A. Hecht
Gary A. Hecht Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox DriveLawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology services, namely, infrastructure and information technology consulting services, system testing and evaluation, planning and design and construction of information technology systems, remote management of the information technology systems of others, design and implementation of networks, providing server and storage consultation and solutions, disaster recovery plans, and providing customized planning and design of new systems and networks and procurement assistance to locate and obtain particular hardware and software required to fill the needs of computer systems and network customers; hosting outsourcing services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; network security services, namely, information technology security assessment and consulting, audit and risk management services, information security management systems assessment and certification, data backup, monitoring of networks, restricting unauthorized access to networks; computer technical support services, namely, help desk services, monitoring technological functions of computer software systems, and troubleshooting computer software problems; learning systems services, namely, developing customized content in the nature of software for e-learning educational and training programs in various fields; learning systems services, namely, customized software design and development, and implementation and management of that customized software for e-learning educational and training programs and modules in various fields | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2023 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |