Drawing for NO SHORE

USPTO serial 87306921

NO SHORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO SHORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Naresh Kilaru

NARESH KILARU FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LL901 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management consultancy services that harness the diverse talents and expertise within project teams in order to maximize efficiencies and productivityACTIVE—
042Consultancy in the field of software design; consulting in the field of information technology; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); computer services, namely, remote management of the IT systems of others; computer services, namely, on-site management of IT systems; planning, design and management of information technology systems; computer programming and software design; computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; SAAS services featuring software for use in enterprise resource planning, learning management, student management, collaboration software, analytics, campus management; all of the foregoing related to software and consulting services that harness the diverse talents and expertise within project teams in order to maximize efficiencies and productivityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance