USPTO serial 87307292
T - RUMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with T - RUMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter C. Lemire
PETER C. LEMIRE LEYENDECKER & LEMIRE, LLC5460 S. QUEBEC STSUITE 330GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Boxer briefs; Boxer shorts; Hats; Hoodies; Jackets; Panties; Pants; Shirts; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; Shoes; Shorts; Skull caps; Sweatshirts; Collared shirts; Graphic T-shirts; Henley shirts; Hooded sweatshirts; Long-sleeved shirts; Polo shirts; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; Sport shirts; T-shirts; Underwear, namely, boy shorts | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |