USPTO serial 87308351
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lloydminster, SK, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Nissen
ROBERT A. NISSEN NISSEN PATENT LAW10328 81 AVENUE NWEDMONTON, ALBERTA, T6E1X2CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books on the subject matter of career development, personal development, spiritual development, health and wellness, lifestyle, and relationships | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | life coaching in the fields of career development, personal development, spiritual development, health and wellness, lifestyle, and relationships; workshops and seminars in the fields of career development, personal development, spiritual development, health and wellness, lifestyle, and relationships and distribution of course materials in connection therewith; providing information on education | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | counseling in the field of personal development, namely, self-improvement, self-fulfillment, and interpersonal communication; providing information in the field of personal development, namely, self-improvement, self-fulfillment, and interpersonal communication | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |