CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PEEL PUB

USPTO serial 87308641

PEEL PUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEEL PUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Drinking glasses; shot glasses; mugs; plates; cups; saucers; swizzle sticksACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, hats, tuques, sweaters, jogging suits, caps, t-shirts, shorts, sweat shirts, polo shirts, boxer shorts, socks, scarves, gloves, mittens, jackets, blazers; ski wear, namely, ski pants, ski jackets and ski bibs, aprons, pants, ties, work shirtsACTIVE—
043Restaurant services; tavern servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 19, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 19, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance