Drawing for PLAYERMAX

USPTO serial 87308664

PLAYERMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5662043Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2019
Examiner
GULIANO, ROBERT N
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with PLAYERMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lian Ernette

Lian Ernette Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.10220 Aristocrat WayLas Vegas, NV 89135United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for electronic gaming machines, hand held electronic devices, wireless communication devices and internet enabled devices for operating slot machines; software for casino social media application for hand held computers, portable media players for operating social media websites and social media integration; software for operating loyalty programs, dining, reservations, marketing, promotional coupon redemption and push notifications; computer software for operating electronic games providing floor positioning, geofencing, micro beacon map location, social media integration and casino host interaction for use in the gaming industryACTIVEMar 21, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 30, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 30, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 12, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 3, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 15, 2018SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2018CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 22, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 1, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 1, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 1, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance