USPTO serial 87309095
GREEN MOUNTAIN TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2017
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GREEN MOUNTAIN TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MEMPHIS, TN
Memphis, TN
Memphis, TN
Memphis, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia M. Chester
Julia M. Chester Sidley Austin LLP2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 2000Dallas, TX 75201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing parcel spend management services for high-volume parcel shippers, namely, providing business consulting services, business information services, and business advisory services featuring strategies regarding contract management for shippers, network optimization for shippers and solutions for shipping invoice automation and shipping invoice validation; Providing parcel spend management services for high-volume parcel shippers, namely, network optimization for shippers in the nature of technical support to identify cost, namely, consulting services relating to cost accounting, and consulting services relating to cost analyses | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2015 |
| 036 | Providing parcel spend management services for high-volume parcel shippers, namely, spend analytics and spend visibility solutions for shippers in the nature of providing financial analysis, financial advice and financial consultation | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2015 |
| 042 | Providing parcel spend management services for high-volume parcel shippers, namely, network optimization for shippers in the nature of technical support, namely, consulting services relating to computer network configuration and advisory services relating to computer network design for others featuring information relating to service improvement opportunities by automating clients' delivery networks; Providing parcel spend management services for high-volume parcel shippers, namely, spend visibility solutions in the nature of providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for viewing, analyzing and managing the spending of high-volume parcel shippers; Providing parcel spend management for high-volume parcel shippers, namely, spend visibility solutions in the nature of providing online non-downloadable software for viewing, analyzing and managing the spending of high-volume parcel shippers | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GMT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Green Mountain Technology LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Green Mountain Technology LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Green Mountain Technology LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GREEN MOUNTAIN TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | PR15 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15 | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 9, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |