USPTO serial 87309270
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Baker
CHRISTINE M. BAKER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C.3580 CARMEL MOUNTAIN ROAD, SUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical goods, prescription eyewear, namely, eyeglasses/sunglasses having adjustable optical power lenses, frames for eyewear, protective eyewear, eyeglass frames, eyeglass cases, prescription eyeglasses, eyeglasses with partial vision occlusion, eyeglasses adapted to protect the eyes, adjustable power eyeglasses, eyeglass lenses, tinted eyeglasses, optical lenses, spectacles (optics), frames for spectacles, prescription sunglasses, optical instruments and apparatus, eyepieces, instruments containing eyepieces, holders and cases, eyeshades, prescription eyeshades | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |