Drawing for BLEND VENDING

USPTO serial 87309941

BLEND VENDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLEND VENDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus Stephen Harris

Marcus Stephen Harris Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP111 E. WackerSuite 2800CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007vending machines for smoothies and juicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 12, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 9, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 9, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 19, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 21, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 20, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 20, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 20, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 15, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance