USPTO serial 87311354
DB DESIGN BOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DB DESIGN BOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathleen E. Stadecker
CATHLEEN E. STADECKER DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREET, P.O. BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing a website at which entrepreneurs post projects to attract venture capital; operating an on-line marketplace for sellers of services, namely, offering of skilled services on a contract or employee basis; providing on-line computer databases and on-line searchable databases in the fields of entrepreneurship and business development, namely, providing listings of businesses' needs for employees, contractors, consultants, product developers, engineers, business founders, entrepreneurs, and investors as well as listings describing the skills and qualifications of, and opportunities sought by, employees, contractors, consultants, product developers, engineers, business founders, entrepreneurs, and investors | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2014 |
| 042 | Provision of computer services in the nature of online profiles for businesses, employees, contractors, consultants, product developers, engineers, business founders, entrepreneurs, and investors for the purposes of facilitating employment and investment in the fields of engineering, computer programming, and product development | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |