Drawing for LIFE AS ART

USPTO serial 87311428

LIFE AS ART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFE AS ART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee J. Eulgen

LEE J. EULGEN NEAL GERBER & EISENBERG LLPTWO NORTH LASALLE STREETCHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Video synchronization services, namely, digital transfer services transferring video into digital format; video hosting of digital content on the internet; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software to digitize, edit and encode multimedia, audio, video, photography and paper documents and files over communications networks; computer services, namely, cloud-based hosting storage of digital photographs and videos; electronic storage of personal and family photos and videos; computer services, namely, conversion of images from physical to electronic media; providing a website for the electronic storage of digital photographs and videos; providing on-line, non-downloadable software for image conversion and transfer of imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance