Drawing for HIVALGO SPECIALTY COMMODITIES

USPTO serial 87311743

HIVALGO SPECIALTY COMMODITIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIVALGO SPECIALTY COMMODITIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendy Robertson

WENDY ROBERTSON BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC6060 POPLAR AVENUE, SUITE 440MEMPHIS, TN 38119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an online exchange, namely, introducing buyers and sellers of high value grains and oilseeds, via a global computer information network; providing an online database of commercial information concerning high value grains and oilseeds; logistics coordination services, namely, arranging the transportation of high value grains and oilseeds from sellers to buyers; Providing an online database of consumer information required by a buyer of high value grains and oilseeds to make a bid to purchase or a seller of high value grains and oilseeds to make an offer to sell, namely, historic pricing and inventory informationACTIVE—
044Providing an online database of agricultural information required by a seller of high value grains and oilseeds to make an offer to sell or a buyer of high value grains and oilseeds to make a bid to purchase, namely, historic yields and traitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance