USPTO serial 87312482
Serial No. 87312482
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 87312482?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Cooper
DAVID P COOPER KOLISCH HARTWELL PC520 SW YAMHILL STREET SUITE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DVDs featuring content about the western U.S. concerning all aspects of that region in terms of the land, climate, indigenous and immigrant human cultures, including all aspects of human life | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 016 | books in the field of content about the western U.S. concerning all aspects of that region in terms of the land, climate, indigenous and immigrant human cultures, including all aspects of human life; pens; desk accessories, namely, paperweights, pencil, pen and paper clip holders, and desk blotters; maps | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 018 | Horse gear, namely, saddles, halters, bridles, horse shoes, blankets, and saddle bags; leather goods, namely, purses, wallets, and bags | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 021 | beverage glassware; barware, namely, seltzer bottles | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | clothing of all types, namely, shirts, pants, vests, sweaters, hats, belts, boots, shoes, moccasins, and slippers | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 029 | food, namely, meat; processed foods and staple foods of all types, namely, bread, crackers, flour and corn meal, fruit rolls, cookies, beef jerky, and salmon jerky | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 030 | processed foods and staple foods of all types, namely, fruit rolls, cookies, beef jerky, and salmon jerky | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages and light beverages of all types, namely, soda, lemonade, iced tea, ginger ale, sarsaparilla | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 033 | spirits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oregon Brand Licensing LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 10, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |