USPTO serial 87313290
CANNAHAUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CANNAHAUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith White, PLLC
KEITH WHITE, PLLC KEITH WHITE, PLLC198A ROGERS AVENUEBROOKLYN, NY 11225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Food flavorings being non-essential oils; Food flavourings, other than essential oils; Food leavening agents; Food seasonings; Food starch; Ready-to-eat cereals; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; Snack food chews made primarily from brown rice syrup; Snack foods, namely, chocolate-based snack foods; Arrowroot for use as a food thickener; Barley flour; Buckwheat flour; Candy for food; Cereal based snack food; Cereal based snack food; Cereal-based snack food; Cereal-based snack foods; Cereal-based snack food; Cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; Cheese-flavored corn snacks; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Chocolates and chocolate based ready to eat candies and snacks; Chocolates and chocolate based ready to eat candies and snacks; Coffee-based snack foods; Confectioneries, namely, snack foods, namely, chocolate; Corn chips; Corn fingers; Corn flour; Corn starch; Corn-based snack foods; Extruded corn snacks; Farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; Flour for food; Fructose for food; Fruit paste for flavouring of food; Grain-based food bars; Grain-based food beverages; Grain-based snack foods; Grass-based food beverages; Groats for human food; Herb tea; Herbal food beverages; Herbal tea; Malt extract for food; Malt extracts for food; Malt for food purposes; Maltose for food; Molasses for food; Multigrain-based snack foods; Potato flour; Powdered starch syrup; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; Propolis for food purposes; Puffed corn snacks; Pulse flour for food; Quinoa-based food bars; Rice chips; Rice-based snack food; Rice-based snack foods; Rice-based snack food; Royal jelly for food purposes; Saffron for use as a food seasoning; Sago palm starch; Salt for preserving food; Starch for food; Starch for use in manufacturing food; Starch syrup; Sweet potato starch for food; Syrup for flavoring food or beverages; Tapioca flour; Turmeric for food; Vanilla flavorings for food or beverages; Wheat flour; Wheat-based snack foods; Yeast extracts for food | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |