Drawing for CEREBRO

USPTO serial 87313295

CEREBRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINDEMYER, ANKHI MUKHERJEA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CEREBRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne H. Peck

Anne H. Peck Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NWSuite 700Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable middleware for enabling diverse users the ability to work and collaborate on shared pools of data while satisfying security and governance needs; Downloadable software for enabling diverse users the ability to work and collaborate on shared pools of data while satisfying security and governance needs; Downloadable software for data management for big data platforms; Downloadable software for data management for analytics environments for enterprises; Downloadable software for security, governance and performance management for external storage systems, allowing users to use any kind of analytics tool; Downloadable cloud-computing software for enabling diverse users the ability to work and collaborate on shared pools of data while satisfying security and governance needs; Downloadable cloud-computing software for data management for big data platformsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 26, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 26, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 9, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 17, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 4, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 25, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 24, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 18, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance