USPTO serial 87313306
Serial No. 87313306
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 87313306?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ottawa Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Getz
RICHARD D. GETZ O'SHEA GETZ P.C.10 WATERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 205FARMINGTON, CT 06032UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Online operating marketplace services for use by service provider businesses to promote and sell services in the fields of electronic IT support, database administration and management, site reliability engineering, software development, software engineering, data analytics and for organizations to purchase same; business intermediary services relating to the matching of service provider businesses and potential client organizations in the fields of electronic IT support, database administration and management, site reliability engineering, software development, software engineering, data analytics; business management services relating to information and data compiling and analyzing; database management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Platform as a service (PAAS) comprising computer software platforms for virtual operating systems and desktops on demand, recording and analytics of user sessions, and professional services sales and delivery management for use in the fields of electronic IT support, database administration and management, site reliability engineering, software development, software engineering, data analytics; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of software comprising a secure remote virtual environment through which providers may market, sell and perform services for their client organizations in the fields of electronic IT support, database administration and management, site reliability engineering, software development, software engineering, data analytics; providing virtual computer environments through cloud computing to support information technology operations, database administration and management, site reliability engineering, software development, software engineering, data analytics; development of software for secure network operations; providing a secure remote virtual environment through which providers may perform services for their client organizations in the fields of electronic IT support, database administration and management, site reliability engineering, software development, software engineering, data analytics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |