USPTO serial 87313506
AMP SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GANDARA, KEYLA MARIA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMP SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
American Fork, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Jeppsen
ERIC JEPPSEN BTJD3165 E. MILLROCK DRIVESUITE 500SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Home automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, and software for lighting, HVAC, safety, and other home and office control applications; home security systems in the nature of wireless burglar alarms; control panels for home automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, and software for lighting, HVAC, safety, and other home and office control applications; Climate control systems comprising digital thermostats; Lighting systems comprising lighting controls for limiting energy usage of lights; Fire and burglar alarms for residential and commercial buildings; gas alarms, namely, carbon monoxide detectors; emergency alarms, namely, emergency evacuation devices, namely, fire alarm control panels, smoke detectors; Trouble alarms for residential and commercial buildings, namely, sound alarms, motion detectors for perimeters, doors and windows, electronic panic button incorporated into a pendant and electronic water sensors for detecting water leaks in home appliances; Lighting systems, namely, lighting controls; automation lock systems comprising electronic controls for monitoring and controlling electronic locking mechanisms; home and office HVAC automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, software and electronic control devices for monitoring and controlling home and office heating and cooling operations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |