CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OCEANWIDE

USPTO serial 87314108

OCEANWIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, SHA-KARA ELOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCEANWIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Prakash NAMA

121 Moore St.Princeton, NJ 08540UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Convalescence homes; Health care; Hospital services; Landscape gardening; Medical clinic services; Nursing, medical; Opticians' services; Rehabilitation patient care servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 21, 2020PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2020ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
May 11, 2020PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
May 11, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 22, 2020ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Jan 8, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 29, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 21, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 15, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance