USPTO serial 87314407
WOODPEKKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAH, RUPALI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WOODPEKKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | baby shampoo, baby powder, baby face lotion, baby body wash, topical non-medicated baby skin care preparations, baby hair shampoo and body wash, baby fragrances, baby skin moisturizers, non-medicated baby balms for use on skin, baby powders, baby oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |