USPTO serial 87316726
SHARX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 2019
- Examiner
- JENKINS, KEISHA MONIQUE HARD
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with SHARX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cincinnati, OH, US
Cincinnati, OH, US
Cincinnati, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney LEE & HAYES, PC601 WEST RIVERSIDE, SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Carbon, fiberglass, synthetic, and mixed fiber fabric for use in marine, recreational, industrial, automotive and aerospace applications; braided fabrics used as reinforcement for composite materials in non-textile applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Braided fabrics made of natural fibers for use as for reinforcement in textile use applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Carbon, fiberglass, synthetic, and mixed fiber fabric for use in marine, recreational, industrial, automotive and aerospace applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by A & P Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by A & P Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by A & P Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named SHARX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 15, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 15, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 15, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |