Drawing for WE PUT THE TRUST IN IDENTITY

USPTO serial 87318282

WE PUT THE TRUST IN IDENTITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE PUT THE TRUST IN IDENTITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Brucker

William J. Brucker Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker75 ENTERPRISE, SUITE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for issuing digital certificates for authenticating users for access to online systems for use in an electronic transaction or communication; encoded smart cards containing programming, namely, digital certificates, used to verify the identity of parties to an electronic transactionACTIVE—
042Issuance and validation of digital certificates for providing authentication of the source of a digital communication, authentication of identity and/or of a digital signature in an electronic transaction or communication, and for authentication of identity for physical or logical access controlACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 29, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 12, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 11, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 11, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 11, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 26, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 26, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance