USPTO serial 87318671
VIRTUAL LAWYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5505052Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2018
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIRTUAL LAWYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Spotora
ANTHONY J. SPOTORA SPOTORA & ASSOCIATES, P.C.1801 CENTURY PARK EAST25 FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting of educational seminars, conferences, workshops, and courses in the field of professional development as it relates to legal and business professionals; Educational services, namely, providing live and online classes, lectures, seminars, and workshops in the fields of legal services, and business administration and management; Educational services, namely, providing online and in-person training courses, seminars and workshops on how to assist businesses to develop and grow; Developing educational lesson plans in the field of starting and managing a law firm; Arranging of lectures, courses, workshops, and seminars in the fields in the fields of technology-based entrepreneurship and innovation; Arranging professional workshops and training courses in the fields of technology-bases entrepreneurship and innovation among licensed attorneys; Arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting social entertainment events; Business education and training services, namely, developing and facilitating customized business development programs for licensed attorneys; Business training; Business training consultancy services; Arrangement of training courses in teaching institutes in the fields of business development, management, and administration; providing a website featuring online blogs in the nature of articles in the field of starting and operating a law practice, business development, management, and administration, technological advancements, entrepreneurship, and finance; publication of electronic books and journals online; publication of texts; advisory services relating to the aforesaid; advisory services relating to the aforesaid services provided online from a computer database or the Internet; advisory services relating to the aforesaid services provided over a telecommunications network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 5, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 23, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 5, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 5, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |