USPTO serial 87319045
DRONEPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRONEPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Greenwich, RI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Drones; Drones in the nature of hexacopters for agricultural use to survey crop health; Camera drones; Camera drones, other than toys; Civilian drones | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2018 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |