USPTO serial 87319303
HOMTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOPKINS II, DEAN ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOMTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorri W. Cooper
Lorri W. Cooper Law Artisans LLC387 Wakefield Run BlvdHinckley, OH 44233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Bed pillows; Bed bases; Bed headboards; Bed rests; Beds; Box springs; Furniture; Mattress cushions; Mattress foundations; Mattress toppers; Mattresses; Adjustable beds; Fiber beds | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1988 |
| 024 | Bed blankets; Bed covers; Bed linen; Bed pads; Bed sheets; Bed skirts; Bed spreads; Bed throws; Mattress covers; Mattress pads; Pillow cases; Sheet sets; Children's bed sheets, pillow cases, and blankets; Fitted bed sheets; Flat bed sheets, excluding towels, wash cloths, cloth bar wipes | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |