USPTO serial 87319906
NUTTALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTTALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angela P. Doughty
ANGELA P. DOUGHTY WARD AND SMITH, P.A.5430 WADE PARK BLVD, SUITE 400RALEIGH, NC 27607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Product display equipment, namely, heated display cabinets, refrigerated merchandise display cases, and heated merchandise display cases; salad bars, namely, refrigerated self-service salad cases and refrigerated merchandise display cases for use displaying salad bars; refrigeration equipment for product display, namely, refrigerated merchandise display cases, refrigerating display cabinets, refrigerated self-service cases, refrigerated self-service deli cases, and portable refrigerators; heating equipment for product display, namely, heated display cabinets and heated merchandise display cases; lights for use in illuminating signs and displays; refrigerating display cabinets; heated display cabinets; refrigerated self-service cases, refrigerated self-service deli cases and custom fabricated refrigeration systems used by supermarkets, restaurants, cafes, delicatessens, take-away restaurants, and convenience stores to store and display food and beverage products; modular counters for refrigerating, heating and chilling foods; structural parts and fittings for all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Product display equipment, namely, sales and display counters, furniture for displaying goods, non-heated or refrigerated cabinets for display purposes, and sneeze guards for protecting salad bars and food counters; restaurant counters, namely, non-heated and non-refrigerated sales and display counters for use in restaurants; restaurant furniture, namely, non-heated and non-refrigerated sales and display counters for use in restaurants, sneeze guards for protecting salad bars and food counters, dining tables, dining chairs, and benches; salad bars, namely, non-heated and non refrigerated sales and display counters for use in restaurants and sneeze guards for protecting salad bars and food counters; retail store furniture; furniture, namely, sales and display counters; furniture for displaying goods; point of purchase displays; display racks; display boards; signboards of plastic; fitted cupboards, furniture fittings, not of metal; structural parts and fittings for all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |