Drawing for Serial No. 87321148

USPTO serial 87321148

Serial No. 87321148

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 87321148?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Christopher

JOHN CHRISTOPHER Christopher & Weisberg, P.A.1232 N. University DrivePlantation, FL 33322UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely for logistics data processing, provisioning, analysis and presentation of freight rates and obtaining logistics data and freight rates from several databasesACTIVE—
035Business management; Price Comparison services; Cost price analysis; Economic forecasting; Compilation of StatisticsACTIVE—
039Transportation logistics, namely for freight brokerage, freight forwarding, ship brokerage, transport brokerage, transport reservation, and transportation informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 23, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance