Drawing for BEAN PORTER

USPTO serial 87321948

BEAN PORTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAN PORTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather E. Balmat

HEATHER E BALMAT BALMAT LAW PLLC977 SEMINOLE TRAIL#342CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer; PorterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 17, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 13, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 7, 2019GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 7, 2019GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 7, 2019CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 25, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 25, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 25, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 25, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 25, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance