USPTO serial 87322736
FANCAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABLE, ERIC
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FANCAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith D. Harden
KEITH D. HARDEN MUNCK WILSON MANDALA LLPP.O. DRAWER 800889DOCKET CLERKDALLAS, TX 75380Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing an interactive website featuring temporary use of nondownloadable software technology that allows users to search for, consolidate, and manage content from social networks, accounts, and connections to existing and emerging application programming interfaces (APIs), and for creating an on-line community for registered users to get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking featuring social media services and topics of general interest to such users; Software services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software in the nature of a search platform to allow users to request information on various topics, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software that allows users to aggregate information from multiple sources, and providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for creating and sharing custom webpages; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the fields of computer networking, computer programming, and computer software design; Industrial analysis and industrial research services in the fields of computer networking, computer programming, and computer software design; Design and development of computer hardware and software | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2018 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |