Drawing for SKUP

USPTO serial 87323771

SKUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca Liebowitz

REBECCA LIEBOWITZ VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in providing digital interactive experiences, namely, software for viewing and displaying data and images in virtual reality, augmented reality, interactive media, immersive exhibits, interactive displays, natural user interfaces, touch screen displays, and calm technology displays; peripheral devices and electronic systems applied to digital interactivity, namely, interactive computer kiosks, computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer operating softwareACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer software, applied to digital interactivity; renting of peripheral devices and electronic systems applied to digital interactivity; electronic data storage; update and maintenance of computer programs; consultancy in software and hardware design and development applied to digital interactivity; consultancy in information technology; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in providing digital interactive experiences, namely, software for viewing and displaying data and images in virtual reality, augmented reality, interactive media, immersive exhibits, interactive displays, natural user interfaces, touch screen displays, and calm technology displays; monitoring of computer systems through remote access to ensure proper functioning; industrial design, namely, design of furniture and interactive computer kiosks applied to digital interactivityACTIVE—
045Licensing of computer programs and applications, applied to digital interactivity or notACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 30, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance