Drawing for SF SPECIAL FORCE S2F S.K.I.L.L.

USPTO serial 87324970

SF SPECIAL FORCE S2F S.K.I.L.L.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5505955Status 705Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2018
Examiner
ROSEN, AMANDA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.

Status 705: Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights.

Need help with SF SPECIAL FORCE S2F S.K.I.L.L.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher P. Sherwin

Christopher P. Sherwin The Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Computer game software, Video game software, Downloadable electronic games via the internet and wireless devices; Interactive game software, Electronic game software for wireless devices, Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phonesACTIVE—
028[ Amusement game machines; Apparatus for electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor, Apparatus for electronic games adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; Arcade games ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
041Providing amusement facilities, namely, game centers; Providing on-line computer games; Providing amusement arcade services; Providing recreation facilities; Electronic games services provided by means of the internet; Provision of information relating to electronic computer games provided via the Internet; Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic gamesACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer game software; Maintenance of computer software; Up-dating of computer software; Rental of computer software; Installation of computer software; Programming of computer software for others; creation and maintenance of websites for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2024C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 18, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 1, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance