USPTO serial 87328111
DR. RUDOLPH HUGO MEYER KINO PLASMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADEMI, XHENETA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DR. RUDOLPH HUGO MEYER KINO PLASMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Koblenz, DE
Koblenz, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin M. Kerenyi
JUSTIN M. KERENYI HALL BOOTH SMITH, P.C.191 PEACHTREE ST.STE 2900ATLANTA, GA 30303Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical devices, namely, optical lenses, enhancers in the nature of optical filters, correctors in the nature of spectacle lenses, filters, sensors, reflectors, phase shifters, condensers; infrared optical filters; optical objectives for cameras; instruments containing eyepieces, namely, optical lenses; spectacle lens blanks; optical lenses made of glass; protective caps for cameras; lens filters and light filters for cameras; tilting heads and lens hoods for cameras; lenses for photographic apparatus; telescopes; audio and visual and photographic devices, namely, cameras, video cameras, and photographic cameras; exposed slide films; information technology and audiovisual equipment, namely, audiovisual receivers; cameras; measuring, detecting and monitoring instruments, indicators and controllers, namely, optical sensors, optical scanners, and optical transmitters; lasers not for medical use; camera lenses; cases adapted for binoculars; binoculars; monoculars; optical goggles; telescopic sights; theatre glasses; spotting scopes; camera filters; camera hoods; flashlamps for cameras; stands for photographic apparatus; pouches being backs specially fitted and adapted for photographic apparatus; shutters, viewfinders, and self-timer for cameras; camera mounts; cinematographic apparatus; optical receivers, encoders, and transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |