Drawing for FINELINE

USPTO serial 87328382

FINELINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FINELINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danny Bronski

DANNY BRONSKI VeriTrademarkPO Box 5543Portland, OR 97228UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Ceiling panels, not of metal; Wall panels not of metal; Wood panellingACTIVEJun 1, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 23, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 22, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance