Drawing for SYNERGY EFFECT

USPTO serial 87328780

SYNERGY EFFECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNERGY EFFECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig N. Killen

Craig N. Killen Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP301 South College Street, 23rd FloorOne Wells Fargo CenterCharlotte, NC 28202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail and online retail store services featuring cosmetics, personal care products, non-medicated and medicated skin care treatments, body care preparations and treatments, hair care preparations and treatments, oral care preparations and treatments, nutraceuticals, cosmeceuticals, sun-tanning preparations, sunscreen preparations, dietary supplements, nutritional supplements, teas, herbal teas; medicinal beverages and teas, medicated preparations for treatment of dental and oral diseases, therapeutic treatments for ocular diseases, veterinary products and preparations, apparel, lingerie, swimwear, fashion accessories, bags, sunglasses, fragrances, jewelry, footwear, headwear; towels, bed and bath linens, candles, home décorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2019WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2019WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 27, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance