Drawing for APC

USPTO serial 87330190

APC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5640255Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 1, 2019
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with APC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Devasena Reddy

Devasena Reddy HM LAW GROUP LLP5655 Silver Creek Valley Road, #850San Jose, CA 95138United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer software that regulates power dosing to facilitate cutting, coagulation, vaporizing and devitalizing tissue; computer data carriers having software recorded thereon, namely, software for use in electrosurgical generator systems that regulate power dosing to facilitate cutting, coagulation, vaporizing and devitalizing tissue; electrical controllers with integrated software for use in electrosurgical generator systems that regulate power dosing to facilitate cutting, coagulation, vaporizing and devitalizing tissue; software for the integration of control segments, namely, for operating with controllers for use in electrosurgical generator systems that regulate power dosing to facilitate cutting, coagulation, vaporizing and devitalizing tissueACTIVEDec 1, 1996
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary instruments, namely, electrosurgical generators systems comprising probes, footswitches, cables, filters, pumps, handles, pencils, hoses, probe tips, adapters, suction containers, patient plates, and remote controls for argon plasma coagulationACTIVEDec 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 10, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 25, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 23, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance