USPTO serial 87330758
SYNERLOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNERLOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roman Vayner
ROMAN VAYNER VAYNER LEGAL PLLC1629 K ST. NW, SUITE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Providing business consulting services, namely, assisting companies, associations, and nonprofits in creating solutions and strategic initiatives; providing business consulting for executives in the fields of leadership effectiveness, decision making, communications strategy, and team building; business advisory services, namely, providing techniques to empower leaders to develop strategic intentional awareness, strategic focus, and clarity in decision-making; business consulting services, namely, helping executives visualize past performance, understand present conditions, and cultivate future outcomes through developing customized experiential learning processes; providing information online in the fields of organizational leadership, strategic communications, and team and community-building; providing in-person business forums in the fields of organizational leadership, communications, and team and community-building; arranging and conducting business conferences in the fields of organizational leadership, communications, and team and community-building | ACTIVE | Jan 24, 2017 |
| 038 | (Based on Intent to Use) Providing consulting services to executives in the field of communications; providing an on-line forum in the fields of organizational leadership, communications, and team and community-building | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Educational services, namely, conducting workshops, seminars, conferences, classes and in-person forums in the fields of organizational leadership, communications, and team and community-building; conducting interactive online workshops, seminars, educational conferences, and classes in the fields of organizational leadership, communications, and team and community-building; providing business training in the fields of leadership training and executive coaching | ACTIVE | Jan 24, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Synerlogic, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Synerlogic, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SYNERLOGIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |