Drawing for INSIDE OUT

USPTO serial 87331266

INSIDE OUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOX III, LYAL L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSIDE OUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick M. Bergin

PATRICK M BERGIN VON BRIESEN & ROPER SC411 E WISCONSIN AVESUITE 1000MILWAUKEE, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Gazebos not primarily of metalACTIVE—
020Outdoor furniture; Patio furnitureACTIVE—
021Planters for flowers and plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 23, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 8, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 22, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 18, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 18, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 20, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance