Drawing for VIRTUOSO SPECIALISTS IN THE ART OF TRAVEL

USPTO serial 87331400

VIRTUOSO SPECIALISTS IN THE ART OF TRAVEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SABLE, ERIC
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUOSO SPECIALISTS IN THE ART OF TRAVEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shannon W. Bates

SHANNON W BATES HARPER BATES & CHAMPION LLP1717 MAIN STREET, SUITE 3550DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information networkACTIVEJan 11, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 5, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 5, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 21, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 7, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2019PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Jun 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 13, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 13, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 22, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 29, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2019TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2018GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 13, 2018GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 13, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 30, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance