USPTO serial 87332068
EVERLASTING COMFORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVERLASTING COMFORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Diamond Bar, CA
Diamond Bar, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel C. Cotman
DANIEL C COTMAN COTMAN IP LAW GROUP PLC35 HUGUS ALLEY SUITE 210PASADENA, CA 91103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Cushions; Cushions; Baby head support cushions; Baby head support cushions; Back support cushions not for medical purposes; Chair cushions; Chair cushions; Chair mats in the nature of a pillow or seat liner; Dual-purpose cushions for supporting a feeding bottle and the head and neck of an infant; Infant sleep positioner cushions not for medical or therapeutic purposes; Mattress toppers; Nap mats; Nap mats; Neck support cushions; Pet cushions; Pillow-like device comprising plastic core, fabric, and cushion material to be worn on arm or leg while sleeping or at rest; Pillows; Portable beds for pets; Seat cushions; Sleeping pads | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |